You’re Renting Your Lead Flow. Here’s What That’s Actually Costing You.

You’re Renting Your Lead Flow. Here’s What That’s Actually Costing You. written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

If your largest paid channel disappeared tomorrow, platform shuts down, algorithm changes, cost doubles, your pipeline is gone inside 30 days.

If that’s true, you don’t have a Growth Engine. You have a rented pipeline.

This is the situation most founders are in. Paid ads on two or three platforms. Paid social. Maybe a paid directory. When the credit card stops, the leads stop. The business has revenue but no predictability. It has a dependency.

Owned vs rented

An owned channel is one you control. You decide who’s on it, what reaches them, when. No platform change can touch it.

A rented channel is one someone else controls. You pay for access. You play by their rules. When the rules change or the price goes up, you adjust or you disappear.

The difference compounds over time. A business that builds owned channels for 5 years has compounding value. A business that rents for 5 years has 5 years of expenses. Same spend, completely different position.

The four owned channels

Email

Email has been declared dead roughly once a year for 15 years and keeps working anyway.

A founder who builds a qualified email list over 5 years has direct, reliable, owned access to their audience at zero marginal cost per send. No paid channel comes close to that math.

The list has to be qualified, built from people who asked to be on it. It has to be used consistently. And it has to be treated as a content surface, not a sales channel. The same principles that make content work apply here: genuine point of view, useful, specific.

Most businesses underuse email because it feels unfashionable. That unfashionability is the tell. The channels that feel unfashionable and still work are the ones smart operators quietly compound in.

Referral systems

Referred prospects arrive pre-trusted. They close faster, they’re less price sensitive, and they’re more likely to refer others. Most small businesses have no referral system. They have referrals that happen accidentally.

A real referral system has 3 parts: a specific ask, made at a specific moment, with a specific easy path for the referrer to take. All 3 are necessary. Most businesses are missing at least 2.

The ask needs to be made. Customers don’t refer unless asked because it’s not obvious to them that you want referrals. The moment matters: right after a customer experiences something good is when the ask lands. And the path needs to be easy enough that referring requires almost no effort.

Partnerships

Non-competing businesses that serve the same ideal client are the most underused lead source in small business marketing.

An accounting firm’s ideal client also needs a business lawyer, a financial planner, a banker, an insurance broker. Each of those providers has a list of the same customers. Two or three real partnerships beat 20 casual ones.

A structured partnership has named partners, defined criteria, a regular rhythm of contact, and a way to track what’s being exchanged. Partnerships are work. They compound once they’re real.

Direct relationships

Networking, speaking, association involvement, in-person participation. The oldest channel in the book, and it still produces the highest-intent leads in most categories.

A prospect who hears the founder speak at an industry event arrives at the buying conversation miles ahead of where a paid lead arrives. The trust is largely pre-built.

Direct relationships don’t scale the way email or content scale. They scale with founder effort. Founders who invest in them consistently find that the Growth Engine runs mostly on relationships 2 years in.

Where paid actually belongs

Paid works when it amplifies something already working. If the content is converting organically, paid can extend its reach. If the messaging is landing, paid can get it in front of people it otherwise wouldn’t reach.

Without those foundations, paid produces expensive activity that doesn’t convert. Every founder has seen that at least once.

The healthy ratio for most small businesses: roughly two-thirds of new customer flow from owned channels, one-third from paid amplification. A business running the opposite ratio is fragile, even if the current economics look fine.

One thing to do this week

List every lead source that produced revenue in the last 12 months. Mark each one owned or rented. Count the ratio.

If rented is more than half, the Growth Engine is the priority. Start with the owned channel closest to working but undeveloped. That’s usually email or referral.

The Growth Engine is step 5 of a seven-step system I’ve been refining for over 20 years. The full framework is in my new ebook, “7 Steps to Small Business Marketing Success.” Get it at dtm.world/7steps.

Why Producing More Content Is Making Some Businesses Invisible

Why Producing More Content Is Making Some Businesses Invisible written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

An accounting firm at about $2.5 million in revenue came to me after publishing a monthly blog post for 3 years. Mostly tax updates and compliance news. Traffic was flat. Inbound inquiries were rare. They were thinking about hiring an agency to triple their output.

The right move was the opposite: publish less, go deeper, commit to 3 content pillars.

I see this pattern constantly. Founders who aren’t getting results from content assume the problem is volume. So they add more posts, more channels, more tools. And they get the same results, faster.

Producing more generic content doesn’t fix a content problem. It amplifies it.

The actual problem

Most small business content doesn’t have a job. It’s a series of posts with no spine underneath. Topics that seemed interesting that week. Updates that felt like they should be covered. Technically useful stuff that adds up to nothing.

In a market where AI is generating generic content at industrial scale, being part of the noise layer is bad for your brand. The customers worth winning have started to recognize it and tune out.

Content that actually works does one thing: it earns trust before the customer has to talk to you. It signals that you understand their situation, you’ve thought about it seriously, and you have something specific to say.

Pillars, not posts

Pick 3 content pillars anchored to your ideal client’s real problems. Every piece of content you publish goes to one of them.

I know how this sounds. Organization. A content calendar thing. It’s actually the hardest strategic decision most founders avoid making.

Most businesses publish what the founder was thinking about that week. After a few years you have a body of work with no accumulated weight. A prospect can’t tell what you’re actually expert in.

Three pillars held over 2 or 3 years produces a different result. The body of work has shape. The depth on each pillar becomes visible, and that visibility is what earns trust.

Three is the right number. Two is too narrow. Four dilutes. Three works.

Each pillar has to pass 3 tests: anchored to a real customer problem, an area where you have genuine depth, and one you can publish against for 3 years without getting bored. If it won’t survive that last test, it’s a topic, not a pillar.

Hubs, not archives

Content organized under hub pages compounds over time. Content organized as a reverse-chronological blog buries your best work within weeks.

The reverse-chronological blog is an artifact from when blogs were journals. It made sense then. When content is meant to be a long-term asset serving both readers and AI retrieval systems, it doesn’t.

Under hub pages, your best work stays discoverable and accumulates authority. When you publish something new, link it to the appropriate hub and update the hub to reference it. Over time the hub becomes a genuine knowledge center. The blog archive becomes a graveyard.

Repurposing, not more production

The founders who win on content get maximum leverage out of each substantial piece. Volume isn’t the advantage.

The model: one substantial piece per week or two, repurposed into 8 to 10 smaller assets. A podcast episode becomes a hub page article, a few LinkedIn posts, one email to the list, a short video. A long article becomes an email series, a handful of social posts, eventually a book chapter.

This is where AI actually earns its keep. Taking original thinking and adapting it across formats is something AI does well. Producing original thinking from scratch isn’t. Keep the thinking yours. Use AI for the reformatting.

The point of view problem

The market is full of AI-produced content that reads like AI-produced content. Generic, balanced, readable, forgettable.

The content that still earns attention, gets remembered, and gets shared has a point of view. It takes a position. It says something the customer hasn’t heard, or says something familiar in a way that makes it land differently.

AI can’t produce a real point of view because it’s averaging the existing corpus. Your specific perspective isn’t in there.

Use AI to produce. The thinking is still your job.

Content without a point of view was dismissible in 2020. It’s invisible in 2026.

One thing to do this week

Name your 3 content pillars on one page. If you can’t narrow to 3, the narrowing is the work. Three is not a formatting choice. It’s the strategic constraint that forces real decisions.

Content strategy is step 4 of a seven-step system I’ve been refining for over 20 years. The full framework is in my new ebook, “7 Steps to Small Business Marketing Success.” Get it at dtm.world/7steps.

Why Clarity Comes Before Strategy

Why Clarity Comes Before Strategy written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the Full Episode

 

john jantsch (1)Overview

Most small business owners blame their marketing when growth stalls. They hire a new agency, rebuild the website, launch another campaign — and six months later, nothing has changed. In this solo episode, John Jantsch makes the case that the real problem lives upstream of tactics: it lives with the founder.

This is Step 1 of John’s updated “Seven Steps of Small Business Marketing Success” — a completely refreshed version of the ebook that was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times over the past two decades. Here, John introduces what he calls the Founder Portrait: a one-page, four-question exercise designed to surface the clarity that every downstream marketing decision depends on.

If you are a small business owner, entrepreneur, or marketing consultant working with founders, this episode cuts through the noise. It asks the uncomfortable questions about what is actually working, what you are doing out of habit or guilt, where the real profit lives, and what you want the business to give you — questions that most marketing engagements never touch.

Key Takeaways

01: Marketing consistently fails not at the tactical level but at the founder level — before any campaign is built.
02: Business drift happens slowly and then all at once. Many founders are operating a business that no longer reflects what they intended to build.
03: Activity is not the same as results. What you are doing a lot of and what is actually producing revenue or reducing acquisition cost are often very different things.
04: Naming the things you do out of habit, guilt, or misplaced optimism is the first step toward stopping them — and stopping the right things is often the beginning of real marketing strategy.
05: Revenue and profit are not the same. Some service lines, channels, and client segments look productive but are actively costing you growth.
06: Serving the wrong client — often picked up during a slow period — can hold back scale far more than any tactical gap.
07: Question four — what do you want this business to give you — is the one most founders have stopped asking. No marketing strategy serves a founder who has not answered it.
08: The Founder Portrait is a private document. It is not a plan, not a strategy deck, not something to share. It is the ground you stand on before any other marketing decision is made.
09: One blank page, four questions, no team, no advisors, no AI. The clarity has to come from you.
10: This framework is Strategy First in practice — revisiting who you are and what you want before defining who you serve and how you reach them.

Great Moments

00:01 John introduces the seven-episode series and the updated Seven Steps of Small Business Marketing Success workbook.
01:50 Why marketing fails upstream — the founder is the variable nobody talks about.
02:50 The concept of business drift: slow at first, then all at once.
04:44 Question 1: What is actually working in your business — and how do you know?
05:27 Question 2: What are you doing out of habit, guilt, or misplaced optimism that you should stop?
06:51 Question 3: Where is your business actually making money — versus where are you pretending it is?
09:00 Question 4: What do you actually want this business to give you?
10:45 Introducing the Founder Portrait — the private document that everything else is built on.
12:10 John’s personal ask: email him your answer to question four at john@ducttapemarketing.com.

Memorable Quotes

“Marketing fails upstream — in the tactics, when they are being done — but the founder is often the variable that nobody talks about.”

— John Jantsch

“Drift goes very slowly and then all at once — you find yourself somewhere you never thought you wanted to be.”

— John Jantsch

“There is a difference between activity and what is working. A lot of times we conflate the two.”

— John Jantsch

“No marketing strategy is going to serve you if you do not know what you want the business to give you.”

— John Jantsch

Resources

Seven Steps of Small Business Marketing Success workbook (2026 edition) — dtm.world/7steps 

Email John your answer to question four: john@ducttapemarketing.com

 

 

 



Download


New Tab

John Jantsch (00:01.666)

Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch, and no guests today. I’m actually gonna do a bunch of solo shows. So I’m still gonna have a guest. So if you’re listening in line, you will hear the occasional guests still. But I’m doing seven shows as a series. So if you wanna, I’ll tag them all and I’ll remind you this is episode number three of the seven. but I wrote an ebook about 20 years ago.

Called The Seven Steps of Small Business Marketing Success. It was extremely popular, downloaded hundreds of thousands of times. It was a talk that I gave dozens and dozens of times. Because it really took all of the issues that a lot of small business owners were experiencing with marketing and identified them, but also then put them in order to correct.

So over time that became less relevant. however, the fundamentals of marketing have not changed. So for 2026, I completely updated this. And so there is a brand new version of the seven steps of small business marketing success. And I’ll tell you how you can get a copy of it. It’s more workbook, I think than than ebook. Certainly it has great information in it for you, but but it also asks you to do some things, to think about some things, to take action on things. So

I’ve really been referring to it as more of a workbook. So this is episode number one, which is step number one, and something I call the the founder portrait, why clarity comes before strategy. So quite often marketing fails upstream, if you will, you know, in the tactics, when they’re being done, how they’re being done. but

The founder is often the variable that nobody talks about. And that’s what this episode’s really about. You know, I’ve had this conversation many, many times with founders. they want to hire a new agency, build a new website, do new campaign. Six months later, nothing’s really changed. so the first question I always ask is: I mean, when did you last look at your business? Honestly, when did you last look at your relationship with

John Jantsch (02:19.084)

that business, honestly. And and frankly, that doesn’t sound like a marketing question, but it really is at the heart of a marketing question or or really at the heart of the challenge with marketing that a lot of small business owners face. So and what happens is, you know, a founder starts a business, they start growing successfully, maybe 10 years in, business feels okay.

but it doesn’t feel the same. It doesn’t feel right. kind of it it it’s maybe drifted a little bit from you know, what they thought it was going to be. And and you know, it’s funny with drift, it it goes very slowly and then all at once you find yourself somewhere that that you didn’t think you wanted to be. And and a lot of that has to do with the fact that as a business grows, you know, decisions and how decisions are made actually.

needs to change also. And I think that that what I’ve discovered is that’s one of the toughest ones. Maybe you’re hiring people to do tasks that you used to do, but the decisions for how they’re held accountable, the decisions for what it is that you do now as the founder, you know, is a thing that really never changed. and and this isn’t really a th this definitely is not a story about failure because a lot of times it’s just it’s that thing you just can’t identify. Things seem to be going okay, but you just can’t if identify, you know, the the

The position that you’re in. So here’s what I want you to do. And and if you want to, if you need to stop this, I hate to tell you to stop it because I I want you to come back, but if you need to stop this, go grab a pen and paper, or a pencil, even and paper, and come back here. Cause I’m gonna ask you to give some thought to four pretty intense questions. but but and you may not know the answers to them, but I want to get you thinking.

about them because I think that they can actually unlock some things that maybe you haven’t been able to identify in your marketing. All right, so I’ll pause. You can pause now. Go get that paper or if it’s right there. And we’re back, right? Okay, you’re back with your pen and paper. All right. So here are the four questions. Number one, and you can pause this to answer the questions and come back and and I’ll read the the the other questions as well.

John Jantsch (04:44.534)

What’s actually working in your business and how do you know? This can be a pretty broad question, but I am certainly talking about marketing for the most part. you know, the there’s a difference between activity, you know, like what we’re doing a bunch of and what’s working. and I think a lot of times we conflate activity with with what’s working. So working means it’s produces revenue.

it or it reduces your cost to acquire a customer. I mean, a lot of times everything else is just activity. All right. So that’s number one. What’s actually working and how do you know?

John Jantsch (05:27.436)

Okay, number two.

And this is this is where it starts getting a little interesting for you. What are you doing out of habit, guilt, or maybe even optimism that you should stop? Now, maybe nobody’s ever asked you that, maybe you’ve never even thought about that idea, but boy, especially out of habit. Things that we just do because, hey, we’ve always done them, or everybody in our industry has always done them that way.

John Jantsch (06:01.312)

So as you think about this, think about all the elements of your business. is there a service line that never quite worked, but you can’t give up on? You know, a channel that that that you’ve been on since 2021 and haven’t really considered. I think I think naming it is is quite frankly is the hard part. to really dig in and think, you know, are we on TikTok because everybody said we should be, but we hate it and we don’t know if we’re getting anything out of

So naming it, I think sometimes then gives you the permission to stop doing it. And a lot of times effective marketing or marketing strategy starts with figuring out the things that you’re doing today that you should stop doing. Okay, answer question two, and we’ll move on to three.

John Jantsch (06:51.948)

Where is your business actually making money versus where are you pretending it is? Pretending might feel like a strong word, but I do think a lot of times we just assume you know that might be a better word, that that certain elements or certain things that we’re doing are actually making money for the business. And every now and then, especially if you’re one of those business owners like me, that you know, the the finance part of the business is something that I just

Feel like we hire a bookkeeper and they take care of it. I don’t really study it. But if you’re ignoring that element of your business and you’re not really seeing where profit is, you’re not really tracking the inputs like labor that go into things, quite often we can convince ourselves or kid ourselves that something’s making money because it’s generating revenue. And revenue and profit are certainly not the same thing. So

John Jantsch (07:50.424)

Some of the things that we stick to and continue to do are because we like them, or because we like doing them, or because we feel good about them, or because we’ve always done them. You start doing this math on your PL or really digging into expenses, and you start realizing we should stop focusing on this. And I I’ll tell you one of the areas, one of the areas that I always find.

this is true for a lot of businesses, is that we’re focused on the wrong client, or we’ve taken clients because maybe it was slow that month and and it wasn’t a good fit. We’re losing money on that. We should just stop doing that altogether. We should stop offering that service altogether because even though we can attract clients, it’s actually holding us back. It’s actually costing us an opportunity to actually be able to grow the business or scale the business because.

we won’t let go of that because for fear of the fact that well gosh we’re gonna take a you know a hundred thousand dollar hit or something if we quit doing that line of business. When more often than not, that’s what’s gonna lead to the twenty, thirty, forty percent growth in in the really profitable business. All right. So that was question three.

Question four is quite possibly the hardest for some because we’ve stopped thinking about this. What do we actually want this business to give us? What do you, in your particular case, want this business to give you? Now, most marketing work completely skips this category. And I think that you know, a lot of times when we work with business owners, and that’s why I’m asking these questions, because this is how we start a strategy first engagement.

Is getting into this founder’s portrait, as I like to call it. because a lot of decisions are made because they are to grow revenue or because you saw somebody else doing their marketing a certain way. And and they’re not necessarily based in, well, this is actually what I want this business to give me. I just want to do meaningful work. I want to have a certain exit, I want to have a certain lifestyle. And if we’re not

John Jantsch (09:59.04)

making decisions based on that quite often we’ll we’ll make decisions for the wrong reasons. they won’t be bad decisions necessarily, but they’ll just be made for the wrong reason. So there’s a difference between I think how you would actually view marketing in general based on that. And and if if if you don’t know the answers to that question to number four, really no marketing strategy is going to serve you, or you’ll get lucky, I guess.

if it does. All right. So I hope you took some time. If not, please go back and listen to this. when you’re at a place where that you can actually give some thought to those questions and actually record your thoughts on those questions because you’ll get a lot clearer if you do. So what we’re trying to do is create what what we call the founder’s portrait. So this is not a document that you would ever share. it’s just the ground you stand on. It’s like, okay.

It it’s the filter. you know, without it, I think everything downstream, everything you ask people to do sort of inherits the blur, if you will, that that’s created. with it, I think, who you attract as an IC I see you know a a core client, who you attract

From from a messaging standpoint, the channels that you go on. I mean, everything gets built on something that I think is real because of this founder’s portrait. So this process might take you an hour. One blank page, four questions, no team, no advisors, no AI. Don’t use AI to answer these questions. and and don’t try to turn this into a plan. see where it takes you. See if it opens up questions for you. see if it

is challenging in a way that makes you rethink everything about your business. And again, maybe you’ve got the answer, maybe you’ve got clarity, but quite frankly, that can actually be just as potent knowing that can be just as impotent or just as potent as as as actually coming up with a plan because of it. So one of the things I’d ask you to do if you’re up for this challenge is if you answer these questions. I’d love it if you would

John Jantsch (12:19.176)

just email. It’s just John at Duct Tape Marketing. email me your thoughts on question number four. I would love to collect some of those. I I’d I’d really love to see, you know, what you want the business to give you. I want to see really personal responses. And I and certainly I will reply. There’s no wrong answer, so I’m not gonna tell you, no, you need to redo this. but I’d love to hear what you’re thinking. I’d love to hear how deep that you got.

in those. So that’s all I have for day. for today. I will tell you if you want to get a copy of the ebook that I referenced, this is step number one. I’m going to do seven episodes based on obviously a a session on each step. is it’s DTM.world. So that’s DTM like duct tape marketing dot world slash seven steps. is five bucks. just so you have some skin in the game. But I think you will find

the workbook aspect of this. lots of great information, but also lots of great action steps and things to to ask you to do. So take care and hopefully we will run into you one of these days out there on the road.


Scroll back to top

Why Trust Matters More Than Marketing Now

Why Trust Matters More Than Marketing Now written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the Full Episode

 

Overview

Most law firms are invisible online. Not because they lack credentials, but because they have confused looking professional with being trustworthy. In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch sits down with Megan Hargritter, founder and CEO of Legends Legal Marketing, to dig into what actually builds client trust for solo and small law firms in a world where AI is now making referral decisions.

Megan shares how she niched her agency down to lawyers over 15 years ago and never looked back, and what that decision taught her about marketing focus, client relationships, and the math behind sustainable growth. The conversation covers why generic “professional” content actively hurts law firms, how Google reviews are being read (not just counted) by LLMs, and what firms can do right now to show up in AI-generated recommendations.

Whether you run a law firm, a small agency, or any service business trying to build trust online, this episode delivers actionable insight on SEO, content strategy, and the human element that no AI can manufacture for you.

Guest Bio: Megan Hargritter

Megan Hargritter is the founder and CEO of Legends Legal Marketing, an agency that works exclusively with solo and small law firms. She launched the agency in 2011 from a New Orleans studio apartment with four clients and $2,000 a month in revenue. Over 15 years, she built it into a specialized firm by going deep on one vertical and mastering what actually moves the needle for lawyers. She is the author of Trust Is the Strategy, a framework for law firm marketing in the age of AI-driven search and online reviews.

Key Takeaways

  • Niching works best when it finds you. The most durable niches come from noticing where you produce the best results, not from scanning for market gaps.
  • Polish is not trust. Generic “professional” copy on a law firm website signals nothing to potential clients and ranks for nothing in search.
  • Your homepage should tell the client’s story, not the firm’s story. If a potential client cannot see themselves in the first paragraph, you have already lost them.
  • Attorney bios that lead with credentials are missed opportunities. Vulnerability about why you chose this work and what you have experienced is what converts.
  • LLMs are reading your Google reviews, not just counting stars. Detailed, keyword-rich reviews that describe a solved problem are your most valuable AI-era content asset.
  • Google reviews are the top trust signal for local businesses. When possible, ask clients to duplicate reviews on Yelp for second-tier coverage.
  • Hyper-niche content wins in AI recommendations. Firms that publish deeply specific content on narrow practice areas are showing up where broad firms are not.
  • LinkedIn videos are currently performing well in LLM recommendation signals, an underused channel for attorneys targeting consumers rather than B2B audiences.
  • Claiming and completing directory profiles (Avvo, Super Lawyers, BBB) once a week compounds over time and costs nothing but consistency.
  • Guest podcast appearances are high-authority backlinks, shareable content, and trusted signals. One of the highest-ROI tactics available to any small business owner.

Great Moments (Timestamps)

[00:01] John opens with the central tension: is professional polish actually a liability in the age of AI recommendations?

[01:37] Megan explains the 80/20 math behind her decision to niche exclusively into law firms.

[04:20] The “professional obituary” problem and why law firm bios fail.

[06:37] How to build trust through storytelling: the homepage tells the client’s story, the bio tells the attorney’s.

[09:01] Why Google review quality (not quantity) is the single biggest trust-builder for local businesses right now.

[12:44] What Legends Legal is doing and testing to get law firms recommended by LLMs.

[15:14] What separates firms that grow steadily from ones that plateau, and the cautionary tale of the traffic ticket lawyer.

[17:47] Megan’s top weekly activity for compounding visibility: claim one directory profile.

[18:13] John’s top tactic: guesting on podcasts for backlinks, content, and trust signals.

Memorable Quotes

“Polish is part of the mask they wear, and all it translates to is generic content, generic messaging. It is not making anyone love you.” — Megan Hargritter

“Your homepage should not be your story. It should be their story. If I am facing chapter seven bankruptcy, that is the story the homepage should tell.” — Megan Hargritter

“LLMs are reading reviews. They are not just quantifying the five stars. They are looking for a detailed example of a problem that was solved.” — Megan Hargritter

“Once I felt like I cracked the code on that, I just went all in with lawyers and never looked back.” — Megan Hargritter

“The riskiest thing a lawyer can do right now is keep playing it safe.” — John Jantsch

The New Kind of Invisible: AI Can’t Find Your Business

The New Kind of Invisible: AI Can’t Find Your Business written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Try this right now. Open ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Claude. Type three questions your best customer would ask before hiring someone like you.

Does your business show up?

I’ve run this test with dozens of small business owners in the last year. Most of them disappear completely. Some show up but get described in ways that would make a prospect walk the other direction. A handful get it right.

The ones who get it right aren’t doing anything exotic. They’ve just built a presence that works the way presence has to work now, which is different from how it worked five years ago.

Presence used to have one job

For the first 20 years of the commercial web, presence meant one thing: Google could find you. Get the SEO right, show up in search, done.

That’s still necessary. It’s just not sufficient anymore.

A working presence in 2026 has to pass three tests, and most small businesses are failing at least one of them without realizing it.

Job 1: Findable

Can the right customer, searching for the right thing, actually find you? The mechanics have shifted. Less about keywords stuffed into pages, more about genuine topical authority built over time. But the test is the same.

Here’s the part most people miss: findable now means findable in three places. Traditional search (Google, Bing). Social search (people searching inside platforms). And AI-mediated search, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google’s AI Overviews, and the vertical AI tools your customers are quietly starting to use for research. Each one pulls from different signals. Build for only one and you’ve got gaps.

Job 2: Credible

When a prospect lands on your site, does the site do its job? Does it speak to their situation in their language? Does it show real proof that you’ve done this work for people like them?

I see beautiful websites every week that fail this test completely. Design isn’t the problem. Most of them look great. The problem is there’s nothing there. Generic copy, stock photos, and a contact form. A plain site with deep, specific proof of real work outperforms a polished site with nothing behind it every time.

Job 3: Retrievable

This is the new one, and it’s the one catching businesses off guard.

When an AI assistant answers a question your customer asks, “who should I hire to do X in Y city” or “what should I look for in a contractor for Z,” does your business come up? And when it does, is the description accurate?

AI systems build their answers from whatever you’ve put out publicly. Thin website. Generic content. Missing structured data. Weak third-party presence. The AI either won’t find you or won’t know how to describe you. Being un-retrievable is just the new version of being un-findable. The customer moves on and you never know it happened.

Three things to fix first

Your website

Most small business websites are expensive brochures. They describe the business but don’t sell it. Four things fix most of them: a clear core message above the fold, the ideal client named in their own language, specific proof material, and one obvious next step. Not “contact us.” One low-friction action for the person who’s ready to move.

Hub pages

A hub page is a deep, authoritative page built around one specific topic: a core service, a core customer problem, a category you want to own. Not a blog post. A real resource that earns its place as the best answer on that topic.

Search engines rank them. AI systems cite them. And they give your content something to cluster around instead of floating independently. If your site doesn’t have hub pages, you’re competing on a level playing field with everyone else in your category. Hub pages tilt that field.

Your presence beyond the site

AI doesn’t build its picture of your business from your website alone. It pulls from your Google Business Profile, industry directories, third-party reviews, and mentions across the web. Most small businesses treat this as low-priority busywork. It’s actually the scaffolding holding everything together.

A business with a solid website and strong third-party presence will beat a business with a great website and weak external presence in AI-generated answers. Every time.

Do the test today

Open an AI assistant. Type three questions your ideal customer might ask before hiring someone in your category. Screenshot what comes back.

That’s your baseline. That’s what your prospects are seeing right now. It tells you exactly where to start.

Online presence is one of the seven steps in the framework I’ve been refining for over 20 years. The full system is in my new ebook, “7 Steps to Small Business Marketing Success.” Get it at dtm.world/7steps.

The Reason Your Marketing Feels Broken (And Why More Tactics Won’t Fix It)

The Reason Your Marketing Feels Broken (And Why More Tactics Won’t Fix It) written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

I’ve given this diagnosis so many times it has a name: Random Acts of Marketing.SEO aimed at one audience. Paid ads targeting another. The website describes the business differently than the founder does in a sales call. The content sounds like it came from a different company than the pitch deck. Everything is technically running. Nothing is working together.

This is the most common condition in small business marketing. And it’s almost never caused by lack of effort or thin budgets. It’s caused by the absence of a strategic foundation the tactics can actually build on.

What founders mistake for strategy

Most founders with a tactics problem think they have a strategy. They almost never do.

What they have is a list of tactics they’re running, opinions about each one, and a history of what did and didn’t work. That’s not a strategy. A strategy is a coherent answer to three questions:

Who exactly are we for? What do we do that the alternatives don’t? What’s the one sentence that ties those two things together?

Without those answers, the tactics underneath can’t compound. They just take turns failing.

Strategy First: the three pieces

The strategic foundation has three parts. All three have to exist. Any one of them alone isn’t enough.

The ideal client

A persona isn’t an ideal client. A demographic isn’t an ideal client. “Small business owners between 35 and 55 who value quality” is a description, not a strategy.

An ideal client is a specific type of customer, in a specific situation, whose problem you’re uniquely positioned to solve better than the real alternatives they’re actually considering.

Here’s what specificity looks like in practice: a home services company whose ideal client is “owners of 20-plus-year-old homes in zip codes where houses sell for over $800,000, who’ve lived there more than 3 years and are thinking about aging in place.” That’s a strategy. Every downstream decision, where they advertise, what their photos show, how they price, what they stop offering, can align to that specific person.

The riches are in the niches. That was true when I wrote the original Duct Tape Marketing. It’s more true now. In a market where AI makes it trivially easy to produce generic content for generic audiences, the only marketing that gets through is the marketing clearly made for someone specific.

Differentiation

Two mistakes come up constantly. Claiming differentiation that isn’t actually different (quality, service, experience: every business claims these). And describing differentiation against the wrong competitor.

Your customer is rarely choosing between you and the obvious direct competitor. They’re choosing between you and doing nothing, a different category of solution, or doing it themselves. Your differentiation has to land against that actual set of alternatives.

Differentiation is also a commitment. If you claim to be the firm that does the deepest strategic work before any execution, you can’t also take an emergency project on Monday and deliver by Friday. The claim requires you to turn down certain work. That’s the real test: does your differentiation require you to say no to something?

The core message

One sentence. In the customer’s language. Describes who you’re for and why they’re in the right place.

It has to pass 3 tests. Clear (a smart 12-year-old should understand who you serve and what you do). Different (it can’t be lifted and pasted onto a competitor’s site without anyone noticing). Credible (the customer believes it).

Clever is a tagline. The core message is clear. They can be the same thing. They usually aren’t.

The Marketing Hourglass

Strategy First also gives you the diagnostic lens you’ll use for everything that comes next: the Marketing Hourglass.

Most people were taught to think about the customer journey as a funnel. Leads in the top, customers out the bottom. It’s useful for a narrow slice of the work and dangerously incomplete for the whole picture.

Real growth for small businesses happens inside an hourglass, because the most valuable customer activity happens after the sale. The 7 stages: Know, Like, Trust, Try, Buy, Repeat, Refer. The hourglass widens again after Buy. That’s the part most small businesses ignore, and it’s where the highest-value growth actually lives.

The diagnostic is simple: find the stage where things are leaking and fix it before you build anything new on top.

One thing to do this week

Write your core message. One sentence. Customer’s language. Run it through the 3 tests: clear, different, credible.

If it can’t pass all three, that’s the strategy work. Everything else waits until it does.

This is step two of a seven-step system I’ve been refining for over 20 years. The full framework is in my new ebook, “7 Steps to Small Business Marketing Success.” Get it at dtm.world/7steps.

How to Know When Your Business Is Ready to Scale

How to Know When Your Business Is Ready to Scale written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the Full Episode

Overview

Scaling too fast kills companies. So does scaling too slow. But most business owners never stop to ask whether they have actually earned the right to scale at all. In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch sits down with Mark Roberge, co-founder of Stage 2 Capital, founding CRO of HubSpot, and author of The Science of Scaling, to unpack one of the most misunderstood decisions in business growth.

Mark helped take HubSpot from zero to IPO, then spent years at Harvard Business School teaching founders why so many fast-growing companies implode. His framework asks a different question: instead of “how fast can we grow,” ask “have we proven we deserve to grow?” The answer requires evidence, not instinct, and not pressure from investors.

This episode is for small business owners, agency owners, and entrepreneurs who are thinking about adding headcount, launching new channels, or entering a new stage of growth. If you want to scale without destroying what you built, this conversation is your roadmap.

Guest Bio

Mark Roberge is the co-founder of Stage 2 Capital and the founding Chief Revenue Officer at HubSpot, where he grew the company from zero to IPO. He later joined Harvard Business School as a senior lecturer, teaching founders and operators how to scale with discipline. He is the author of The Sales Acceleration Formula and The Science of Scaling, and has spent the past decade as an investor, board member, and advisor helping companies navigate the gap between early traction and sustainable growth.

Key Takeaways

  • Product-market fit is not a revenue number. It is a retention metric. If customers are not staying and using your product, you do not have it yet, regardless of how many you have signed.
  • Go-to-market fit is the second gate before scaling. It is measured by unit economics, specifically whether you can acquire and serve customers profitably.
  • Scaling revenue too fast is a structural problem, not a motivation problem. Hiring 27 reps when you only have one requires 270 qualified interview screens, management infrastructure, and demand generation that most companies simply do not have.
  • Build a monthly hiring pace instead of a January 2nd headcount dump. Steady, intentional growth gives you time to build the systems that support each new hire.
  • The CRM funnel should not end at closed-won. Retention, engagement, and expansion are stages, not afterthoughts. The Marketing Hourglass is the right model.
  • Leading indicators of retention can be defined simply. Slack tracked whether 80% of customers sent 2,000 team messages per month. You do not need a data science team to build a version of this for your business.
  • A feature is not a moat. If a competitor can replicate your advantage in six months, it is not long-term defensibility. Founders need a vision for what makes them unbeatable over time.
  • The ability to up-level the executive team around you as the company grows is one of the strongest predictors of a successful exit. It is also one of the hardest skills to develop.
  • Sometimes the business outgrows the founder. The COO or president model is not failure. It is graduation. The reframe: someone else does the work you hate so you can focus on the work you love.
  • AI is accelerating faster than society can adapt. Mark is donating book proceeds to McLean Hospital for mental health research, because the people building this technology have a responsibility to help manage its consequences.

Great Moments (Timestamps)

[00:02] — The opening question that reframes every growth decision: are you betting on a business that is not prepared to win?

[04:04] — Mark defines what it actually means to earn the right to scale, and why most founders get this wrong from the start

[06:25] — The two-step framework: product-market fit and go-to-market fit explained clearly

[09:51] — Half scale too fast, half too slow. Mark explains the Groupon and WeWork examples as two failure modes

[11:40] — How to measure product-market fit without a data science team, using Slack and HubSpot as real examples

[13:29] — John and Mark align on why retention and advocacy belong inside the customer journey, not outside it

[16:31] — Why a feature is not a moat, and what long-term defensibility actually requires

[17:43] — The London School of Economics study on what predicts a strong startup exit (the answer will surprise most founders)

[20:33] — The mental health connection: Mark shares why he is donating proceeds to McLean Hospital and what the AI era demands of technologists

Memorable Quotes

“The decision on when to scale is usually when someone hands you a fat check, which doesn’t sound that strategic.” — Mark Roberge

“Do not let the dashboards and sales funnels in your CRM end at closed-won. That is literally step four of seven.” — Mark Roberge

“A feature is not long-term defensibility. If your competitor can build it in six months, you don’t have a moat.” — Mark Roberge

“We’re basically offering to pay for someone to do all the work you hate so you can do the work you love.” — Mark Roberge on helping founders let go

“We as technicians need to diversify our efforts away from just building and profiting toward helping society adapt to this new world.” — Mark Roberge



Download


New Tab

John Jantsch (00:02.19)

So what if every time you hired too fast, launched a new channel or added a service line, you were making a bet that your business actually wasn’t prepared to win. Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duck Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jance and my guest today is Mark Roberge. He’s the co-founder of Stage Two Capital, founding chief revenue officer at HubSpot and the author of a book we’re going to talk about today, The Science of Scaling.

Mark helped grow HubSpot from zero to IPO and then brought what he had learned into Harvard Business School where he taught founders how to grow without blowing up what they built. His framework gives business owners a way to use evidence rather than instinct or outside pressure to decide when they’ve truly earned the right to scale. So Mark, welcome to the show.

Mark Roberge (00:53.259)

Thanks, John. That’s not my copy and I love it. Seriously, I love how you put it.

John Jantsch (00:59.105)

Awesome. good. Well, you know, we were talking before we got started, you and I met some 20 years ago when HubSpot was a nascent business. think maybe the first conference there were 500 people, something of that neighborhood.

Mark Roberge (01:04.916)

Yeah.

Mark Roberge (01:11.393)

Yeah, I was like in a Marriott in Cambridge. I have like, I remember specifically a couple of things about you. I think you were the most famous one of our early partners. I think I remember my last in-person chat with you was in some steakhouse in like South Boston or something. Cause I remember two people came up to you and asked for your autograph and you were like super humble about it. And I’m like, oh my gosh, this is crazy.

John Jantsch (01:21.271)

Ha ha ha!

John Jantsch (01:27.438)

You

John Jantsch (01:35.288)

Well, I’m glad I wasn’t a jerk. That’s for sure. Awesome. Well, let’s get into your book a little bit. So I mentioned HubSpot, Harvard, now you back companies as a VC. Did something you learned or showed up across all three of those roles kind of make you say, I need to write this book?

Mark Roberge (01:37.365)

Hahaha

Mark Roberge (01:54.207)

Yeah. Yeah. It’s like, it’s kind of funny that we can unpack as much as you want, but in reflecting the last 20 years of my life professionally, I’ve given up on having a plan because I never intended to go into sales. I never applied for HubSpot. I never applied or intended to be a professor at Harvard. I never intended to start a venture capital firm.

And I never intended to write either the sales acceleration formula 12 years ago or the scientist’s killing last year. These were all things that like people were like, would you be willing to do this? So they did, they do just like show up and the way that this one, as both books unfolded was a, like you, I am blessed with the opportunity to do a number of keynotes every year. and I, for the big ones like saster, I tended to try to do something fairly original for the year.

So I’ve, you every year I do something original. So I’ve given like 20 to 25 brand new speeches over the last decade. And this one was just like a pattern I saw after like eight years of being out of HubSpot as an independent board member, as a professor, as an advisor, as an investor, in why companies, the few that went IPO and billion dollar valuations versus the ones that went bankrupt was just this.

really non-strategic, non-rigorous perspective on when to scale and how fast. And half do it too early, too fast. Half of them wait too long and go too slow. It’s more about going the optimal time. I started speaking about it and I’m like, it’s ridiculous how many classes and rigorous frameworks we have on accounting for and accruing revenue, but not on scaling revenue. And it just went viral and kept speaking about it, kept writing about it. And then Stanford was like, hey, can you write this up?

And here we have it.

John Jantsch (03:47.128)

So the term, you kind of alluded to it, but I’ll say it directly, earn the right to scale. It does a lot of work in your framework and your talk. So what does a business owner actually have to prove or do to prove that’s true? Like, when do they know I have the right to scale?

Mark Roberge (04:04.286)

Yeah, it’s kind of interesting how it unfolds right now. I I’ve done this with like tractor companies in Brazil and pharmaceutical companies in Japan, but mostly with software companies in Silicon Valley. And it’s kind of funny how it’s decided. Like the decision on when to scale is usually when someone hands you a fat check, which doesn’t sound that strategic.

And so I try to unpack it as two steps that are sequential. One is product market fit and the other is go to market fit. And usually you’re like product market fit, like duh, product market fit, duh. But like, what is product market fit? You know, I think a lot of people will say I’m ready to scale when I have product market fit, which I think is a great answer. But then when I ask them what product market fit is,

I get a lot of different answers, most of which are about a certain revenue number, a certain customer number, a certain number of inbound leads. And then I’m like, well, okay, cool. Let’s say that you have 200 customers or like 500 inbound leads and everyone’s buying, but like people stop using the product. Do you have product market fit? And they’re like, okay, no, but

I’ll just start, I’ll just listen to them and build the product to appease their needs. And I’ll be like, okay, well, how will you know when you’ve achieved it? And they’ll be like, when they keep using the product and don’t churn. And I’m like, exactly. So like that, that’s like the first kind of like pivot mentally for folks is I encourage you to define product market fit, not as a revenue acquisition.

metric, but as a revenue and customer retention metric. And the book talks about how to extract that long-term lagging indicator back to something that you can evaluate in the first week of a customer being with you. Okay, so that’s step one, product market fit. And then if you think about it, once you’ve achieved product market fit, all that means is that when you sign up 10 more customers, they’re gonna see value that you promised and stick around.

John Jantsch (06:00.866)

Yes.

Mark Roberge (06:25.372)

It doesn’t mean that you’ve proven that you can acquire and serve them profitably. And that’s what go-to-market fit is. And it’s measured by UNEconomics. So that’s really the, probably the simplest way to describe the work is these two sequences of product market fit and go-to-market fit as measured by retention in the first one and positive UNEconomics in the second.

John Jantsch (06:29.506)

Mm-hmm.

John Jantsch (06:46.018)

Well, since we’re defining terms, we probably better step back because I bet you if I asked 100 people, 10 people, 100 people sounds like too much work. If I asked 10 people what the word scale means, we’d probably get a bunch of definitions, more leads, more staff, more tools, but how do you define it?

Mark Roberge (06:59.21)

Sure. Sure.

Mark Roberge (07:07.528)

Yeah. So once you are ready to scale the way and that to your point, yeah, that can mean a lot of things. It could mean how do we scale our culture? How do we scale our engineering team? How do we scale our office space? Blah, blah. First off, I’m, I should be more clear that I’m talking about scaling the revenue. And to your point, scaling revenue, the inputs to that vary quite a bit by business by business. if you’re a consumer business, you may just have to spend more on marketing. Something that you know a lot about Joan. if you’re a B2B.

John Jantsch (07:15.094)

Mm-hmm.

John Jantsch (07:21.92)

Okay.

Mark Roberge (07:37.513)

sometimes you have to scale fancy outside salespeople if you’re selling like rockets to governments. And sometimes you do it through PLG. And again, it’s more of like a marketing exercise. So I really talk about scaling the revenue and the principles, apply, whether you’re doing it through pure marketing or through, through sales head count. let’s for simplicity, let’s just talk about scaling through sales head count and the

Big pothole that people make there is even if they follow the guidance of like, let’s achieve product market fit first and then go to market fit, and it could take a day, it could take a week, it could take a month, it could take a year, whatever, and now we’re ready to scale, they raise money and then they have a target for the year and they hire like 27 reps the next week.

even though they only have one on the team today. And there’s just no appreciation of the new capabilities that are needed to hire and onboard and manage 27 reps. Like just like, let’s take one piece of it, which is let’s kind of pontificate that the hiring quality might be correlated to the number of interview screens we do, qualified interview screens to the hire. If I do,

two interview screens and make a hire, I’m probably not gonna make as good of a hire as if I did 10 interview screens and make a hire. So if we’re trying to do 10 and we’re making 27 hires, that’s 270 qualified interview screens. Where are we getting those candidates? Who’s doing the interviews? Nevermind, where’s the demand gen gonna come from? Who’s gonna ramp them? What about the managers? It’s just too driven from a Google Sheet or Excel, and so the simple pivot philosophically is,

Don’t think about it as putting the annual plan together and hiring all those reps on January 2nd. Think about it as establishing a hiring pace every month or every quarter. 10 reps a month, boom, boom, boom. As opposed to like 37 at the beginning of the year.

John Jantsch (09:51.791)

So there’s all kinds of horror stories of companies that blew up because they grew too fast. Would you say that they scaled too fast or they didn’t scale fast enough?

Mark Roberge (09:57.47)

Yes.

Mark Roberge (10:04.928)

Both. have, like I said, it’s about half and half. I mean, I would say like the classic examples out there, like an old school one is Groupon, which I think if you look at it from this lens, never really had product market fit. they just like, the promise was like, if you’re a Chinese restaurant and give these coupons away, you’ll get new customers, but it was really just the existing customers. And then maybe like WeWork never really had go-to-market fit. And that was pretty famously documented story.

John Jantsch (10:21.486)

There’s Buzz. There’s Buzz.

Mark Roberge (10:35.36)

The ones that didn’t scale fast enough, we just don’t know, right? Cause they’re like, I can name some in our portfolio or people I’ve worked with over the years, but the reason why we don’t know them is cause they just sat there and they were like, they had something, but the co-founders just like wanted to just go too slow and continue to do founder selling and wanted to run a profitable business when it needed to be a blitz scale business. And there’s nothing wrong with running a profitable business. just, if you’re trying to win in the AI customer support,

John Jantsch (10:38.702)

Yeah, yeah.

Mark Roberge (11:05.258)

category today, you can’t be profitable right now. Like there’s just certain blitz scale risk that you have in your category that needs to dictate how fast or slow you go.

John Jantsch (11:06.638)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (11:16.056)

So one of the key elements in science of scaling is evidence over instinct. So if I don’t have a giant data team, and I know AI is actually solving some of this right now, but what does evidence actually look like at a startup or smaller business level?

Mark Roberge (11:29.768)

Mm-hmm. Yes.

Mark Roberge (11:40.117)

Yeah, I mean, you don’t, you definitely don’t need like a sophisticated data science team. You don’t even need AI agents doing this stuff. Let me just give you like a really simple example. So we talked about product market fit is where I’m, I’m proposing to everyone that it’s more about customer value and retention as opposed to customer acquisition. And obviously you need to acquire customers to eventually make them valuable. So it’s an input to it.

John Jantsch (11:48.526)

Okay, all right.

Mark Roberge (12:08.34)

The retention is a lagging indicator. So we needed to find a leading indicator of retention. We can’t wait a year to know if we have product market fit. I need to know like the week after I acquired the customer or the month after. And so what the book and the work I’ve been doing with companies for last decade is to help them define their leading indicator of retention. What is it that we can observe in the first month of a customer’s experience with you, your product, your service, whatever.

that if we see that, they’ll be with you forever. And if we don’t, they’ll probably churn. And so like, I frame it as P percent of customers do e-event every tee time. Okay, so that sounds like the programmers on the audience are like loving this right now. The history majors are like totally lost, right? So like, just to bring that to life, Slack, 80 % of customers send 2000 team messages every month. HubSpot, 80 % of customers use five or more features in the platform every month, right?

John Jantsch (12:53.55)

You

Mark Roberge (13:08.564)

These are things that can be measured in the first month to give us insight. If we’re at 80%, we probably have product market fit. If we have 10%, we definitely don’t. I don’t need a data scientist to evaluate that. Okay, so these are not overly complicated, like PhD math type things.

John Jantsch (13:20.174)

So.

John Jantsch (13:29.922)

One of the things I’ve been preaching for 20 years is that when we talk about the customer journey, that retention and advocacy and all the things that come after somebody becomes a customer are part of the customer journey or should be part of the customer journey. And for so many people, it’s let’s get a customer. And I think what you’re really certainly hammering home here is this idea that you’re not going to scale without retention and without

Mark Roberge (13:44.234)

Yes!

John Jantsch (13:59.382)

know, referrals or whatever you call it. Yeah.

Mark Roberge (14:01.984)

Spot on. mean, when I hear people like you say this, the conviction continues to escalate, right? Because it’s like, another way to say what John is saying here is, let’s just talk really tactically. Do not let the dashboards and sales funnels in your CRM end at closed one. That is like literally step four of seven, right? Like let’s just like really step back, like very, very like basic, like.

John Jantsch (14:20.468)

Yeah.

Mark Roberge (14:31.654)

know, opportunity stage one is, you know, business, like discovery call and like business and you know, metrics definition. Step two is product validation, demo, blah, blah. Step three is closed one. Step four is set up. Step five is regular engagement. Step six is retention. That’s the funnel.

John Jantsch (14:52.558)

He

John Jantsch (14:59.438)

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I actually refer to it, have been referring to it as the hourglass, you know, with the idea being that, the funnel, right, but then it goes back out again. Yeah. Yeah.

Mark Roberge (15:06.26)

Totally. And expands. Exactly, because you expand more and like lot of people like winning by design with Jaco and like that’s just a great way, the bow tie. A lot of people like it’s a really good way to think about it because that usage, it represents that the usage and should grow.

John Jantsch (15:16.589)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (15:23.576)

So you were at Harvard and name a dozen schools, Stanford, that a lot of people go to those because they’ve got a big idea or they wanna have a big idea. They wanna turn out the next Google. I’m sure you encountered many founders or would be founders in those environments. What would you like if you were, I’m sure you did this in your class environment.

tell them they’re gonna get wrong or how would you coach them of how you think they’re thinking about it incorrectly?

Mark Roberge (15:58.009)

I mean, there’s a lot to that. I think we covered a lot of them related to the work in terms of like, you know, being more precise around having the business fundamentals in place to be prepared to scale and how you go about scaling. I would say,

I guess I’ll add two more to it that come up a lot, one that’s related to revenue development to some degree and one that it really isn’t. The one I’ll mention is having a plan for a moat. And I would say like, when I ask people what their long-term defensibility will be, they often tell me about a feature.

John Jantsch (16:31.992)

Yes.

Mark Roberge (16:45.468)

And when I asked them if they are correct and they start crushing it and start winning, and then the competition realizes it, how long will it take them for them to build that feature? And they say six months. And I say, that’s not long-term defensibility. So, so you really have to like, you don’t have to prove it on day one. Cause oftentimes it might take something that you have to kind of take one of those design big start small approaches to it.

John Jantsch (17:02.58)

Hehehehe

Mark Roberge (17:14.464)

but you really need to have a vision around if you are right, there will be lots of copycats and the incumbents will try to take you out and you need to make sure that you win there. The other one, unless you want to talk about that, John, I have one more that I can throw out that’s pretty popular. Yeah, yeah, the other one that’s interesting, I think it was a study done at London School of Economics where they looked at like, I don’t know, 5,000 seed funded businesses like 15 years ago and.

John Jantsch (17:22.637)

Yeah.

Yeah.

John Jantsch (17:31.17)

Yeah, yeah, go for it.

Mark Roberge (17:43.282)

and tried to evaluate the commonalities for those that like exited at, you know, very strong exit. The number one correlation was the founder’s ability to up level the executive team around them as they went through the various phases of growth. And it’s like, it’s so pronounced in my journey with some of these folks. It’s like, it’s so hard to do too. Like it’s so hard for like a founder to like stare someone in the eyes who’ve been there in the trenches with them from day one for three years.

and be able to communicate that they are over their head and that the business needs someone ready for the next stage. How you deliver that, how you recognize it, how you have the guts to say it, how you like move through that and still feel like a human and still feel like that person has been made whole. Like that’s such a difficult skill to build, but that there’s so much correlation with successful founders and CEOs and in

developing and executing that skill.

John Jantsch (18:43.372)

Well, and let’s take it up one level. Many times the business outgrows the founder, right? So they may be having that conversation with themselves, right? Yeah.

Mark Roberge (18:48.714)

Sure. It’s very rare that they’re there. Totally. Yeah. And that lots of times the board has to manage that. think we, we went from an, like a culture or like a tactic around that. would say in the eighties and nineties when venture capital was much smaller and startups were, it just, was a much smaller portion of the economy. VCs were notorious for investing in these young technicians and then

fire in them. And I think in the early 2000s, venture took a different approach. They didn’t want to get a reputation for firing CEOs. So they did what I call the Sheryl Sandberg, which is to like bring in the, the operator, but keep the CEO, which is good. think that’s great. think a lot of times that CEO can sort of graduate up to being a

face to the organization, a driver of the culture, a person to be in key meetings with customers, to be on the road, but like don’t have to be or nor qualified to be like the day-to-day operators, hence like today’s COO president role. So, but yeah, sometimes founders, they’re like not willing to let go. And I have to be like, I have to be like, do you even understand that you have graduated to an era and scale that every CEO

John Jantsch (20:00.782)

Yes, yes.

Mark Roberge (20:15.519)

founder dreams of, we’re basically offering to pay for someone to do all the work that you hate and have you just do the work you love, which is product vision, talking to customers and talking to the market. So it’s like, it takes a little reframing, you know.

John Jantsch (20:17.56)

Yeah, that’s right.

John Jantsch (20:23.598)

You

John Jantsch (20:33.16)

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So you, I think your PR people mentioned this, they’re donating the proceeds to the book to McLean Hospital for Mental Health Research. Is there an intentional connection of the subject of scaling to mental health?

Mark Roberge (20:42.014)

Yeah.

Mark Roberge (20:48.113)

my gosh. Huge. Well, not so much. It’s very light. It’s more of an intentional connection to the author. and it’s just something as you’ve experienced, John, it like you get up, you get up in the morning and do these things three times more aggressively when you have a cause like this around you. And there’s two personal reasons and thank you for providing a platform to talk about them. The first one is mental health has played an enormous piece in my own life.

John Jantsch (20:55.992)

Yeah.

Mark Roberge (21:18.259)

I have been a caregiver, a direct caregiver to many loved ones and I’ve been a patient. And I can stand here and say this because I’ve been blessed with certain resume wins that society values and I can be braver than most. And I’m sure by saying that some people may be hesitant to work with me. And I just think we need to fight that stigma more. Like we’ve come a long way in a generation, but

Even to this day, I think a lot of people will be interviewing a candidate and find out they survived cancer 10 years ago and it will elevate their perception of them versus if they found out that they overcame a serious mental illness, they may have some concern and both are just a disease. They’re often genetic. So that’s part of the personal driver. And the second one is I think in this moment in tech, there’s a hundred times more capital talent.

John Jantsch (22:02.03)

Yes.

John Jantsch (22:07.308)

Yes.

Mark Roberge (22:17.009)

an effort going into building AI and next to nothing in helping society adapt to the world that about to become. And I think we as technicians need to change that. We can’t delegate this to Washington or economists. They’re just not close enough to it. And we just need to like really diversify our efforts away from just building and profiting toward

John Jantsch (22:25.347)

Yes.

Mark Roberge (22:44.265)

helping society adapt to this new world. like with every tech revolution, we ended up better as a society, but there are scars along the way. It happened with the internet. They’re about to be really bad with AI if we don’t do anything. So I think we all need to find a little thing to do. And right now that’s my little thing to do.

John Jantsch (22:51.734)

Yes.

John Jantsch (22:59.914)

Awesome. Well, I appreciate you taking a few moments to stop by the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. Any way you’d invite people to connect with you, find out more about your work as well as your latest book.

Mark Roberge (23:11.315)

Yeah, I’m all over. mean, LinkedIn is probably where I’m most at. I’m trying to hang out on TikTok more, John, just to like, because I need to like talk to these 22 year old founders as well, which is awesome. So I’m trying to find where they are. But I’m mostly on LinkedIn if folks want to go on there and collaborate.

John Jantsch (23:25.55)

Well again, I appreciate you stopping by and hopefully we’ll run into you someday in a steakhouse in South Boston. I don’t know how much that’ll be worth to you, if you got a pen, I’ll do it. All right. Thanks, Mark.

Mark Roberge (23:32.305)

I’d love it and maybe I’ll ask for your autograph, John.

Mark Roberge (23:42.578)

All right, it’s great to see you. Thank you.


Scroll back to top

Why Some Entrepreneurs Keep Growing While Others Stall

Why Some Entrepreneurs Keep Growing While Others Stall written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the Full Episode:

Overview

Most business owners are not failing because they lack ambition. They are failing because the daily practices that drive performance quietly erode under pressure, and nobody notices until the stall is already underway. In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch sits down with Jon Gordon, bestselling author of The Energy Bus and his latest release, The Power of Positive Habits, to talk about the micro-practices that separate leaders who keep growing from those who plateau.

Jon has spent two decades working with organizations including the LA Dodgers, Miami Heat, Clemson football, Southwest Airlines, and Dell. His work is grounded in a simple premise: habits are not just personal development tools. They are leadership infrastructure. Without them, you cannot show up consistently for your team, your clients, or your business.

This episode is for entrepreneurs and small business owners who feel like they are already working as hard as they can and still losing ground. Jon walks through specific, actionable habits around mindset, leadership, health, and relationships, and explains why simplicity and practicality are the only things that make habits stick long-term.

Guest Bio

Jon Gordon is a bestselling author of more than 30 books, including The Energy Bus, which has sold over 4 million copies worldwide. He is a sought-after keynote speaker and consultant whose clients include professional sports franchises, Fortune 500 companies, and leadership teams across industries. His work focuses on how positive habits, energy, and mindset drive individual and organizational performance. His latest book, The Power of Positive Habits, compiles 93 proven practices into a practical framework leaders can start using immediately.

Key Takeaways

  • Habits are not just personal development. They are leadership tools. If you are not showing up with the right energy and mindset, your team cannot perform at their best.
  • The thank you walk, taking a morning walk while practicing gratitude, floods the brain with positive emotions that build resilience over time. It is one of the highest-leverage single habits in the book.
  • Connect before you correct. Building genuine relationships with your team is not a soft skill. It is the prerequisite to feedback that actually lands and performance that actually improves.
  • Do not try to build 93 habits at once. Start with one. Master it. Then add a second. The compounding effect of three solid habits will outpace the chaos of chasing all of them simultaneously.
  • Good habits are the first thing to go during stressful times, but they are exactly what you need most when things get hard. Your habits are your foundation, not a reward for when things calm down.
  • Positive thinking is not about ignoring reality. It is about maintaining the belief and optimism necessary to navigate challenges and find a path forward. Pessimists do not build businesses.
  • Most plateaus are caused by a leadership gap or an unresolved wound that is quietly constraining growth. Identifying and working through it is how leaders move to the next level.
  • Mastering the morning, reading, thinking, and doing something positive before the day begins, creates a success anchor. You start the day already winning, which makes you more resilient when the punches come.
  • Principles inform, practices transform. Knowing what you should do is not enough. The habits you actually put into practice are the only thing that changes your life.
  • Jon Gordon was not naturally positive. His habits are the result of deliberate, consistent work over 20 years, not personality. That means these habits are available to anyone willing to practice them.

Great Moments (Timestamps)

[00:01] — John’s opening frame: the owners losing ground without knowing it, and why habits are the hidden culprit

[01:17] — Why Jon wrote this book for leaders specifically, and what makes it different from other habit books

[02:18] — The comparison to Atomic Habits: what ChatGPT said, and why it is worth hearing

[03:26] — The thank you walk explained, and the research behind why gratitude in the morning changes your brain chemistry

[04:43] — How these habits apply to small business owners and entrepreneurs, not just corporate teams

[06:42] — The one thing that makes habits stick long-term, and why complexity is the enemy

[09:07] — What happens when someone tries to do all 93 habits, and what Jon recommends instead

[12:23] — The honest answer to “can you be positive and still face hard realities?” Jon’s response is worth the whole episode

[14:22] — Why plateaus happen, what is really holding people back, and how to move through it

[17:16] — Jon’s personal story: how a failing marriage and a naturally negative mindset led him to build the habits he now teaches

Memorable Quotes

“Principles inform, practices transform. It’s going to be the practices that transform you.” — Jon Gordon

“Being positive doesn’t mean you ignore reality. It means you maintain optimism, belief, and faith in order to create a better reality.” — Jon Gordon

“If you grow your capacity for leadership, you will become greater than your problems.” — Jon Gordon

“Good habits go out the window during stressful times, and they actually need to be our foundation during those stressful times so we stay strong in the storm.” — Jon Gordon

“I’m not naturally positive. And so I have all these positive mindset tips in the book because thinking is a habit.” — Jon Gordon

Before You Touch Your Marketing, Do This First

Before You Touch Your Marketing, Do This First written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Most founders come to a marketing conversation with a tactic already in mind.

Better website. More leads. A LinkedIn strategy. Maybe an AI tool that’ll finally make content easy. The tactic changes. The assumption underneath it doesn’t: the marketing needs to change.

After 20 years doing this work with small businesses, here’s what I’ve actually seen. The marketing is rarely the first thing that needs to change. The founder’s clarity is.

Not because anything is wrong with the founder. Most of the founders who ask for marketing help are working hard and carrying a lot. The problem isn’t effort. It’s that they’ve lost the ability to see their own business clearly.

Why that happens

Five years in. Ten years in. You’ve absorbed a hundred opinions about what your business should be, and somewhere along the way you drifted from what it actually is.

You’re making decisions based on the business you remember, or the one you wish you had. Every new strategy you install inherits that confusion.

I watched a founder last year build out a full content strategy, hire a new agency, and rewrite their website. Same results they’d been getting for 3 years. The strategy was fine. The clarity underneath it wasn’t there.

The Founder Portrait: 4 questions most founders avoid

Before you touch strategy, before you change anything about your marketing, do this. One hour. A blank page. Four questions.

What’s actually working right now, and how do I know?

Not what you’re doing. What’s working. There’s a difference, and most founders can’t answer it with specifics.

“Working” has a real definition: it produces revenue, a measurable input to revenue, or it reduces what you’re spending to acquire revenue. Everything else is activity. If you can’t name what’s working and point to the evidence, that’s a starting point.

What am I doing out of habit, guilt, or optimism that I should stop?

Every business carries weight it doesn’t need. A service line that never quite worked. A customer segment that costs more than it pays. A channel somebody told you to be on 3 years ago.

The honest answer is almost always 3 to 5 specific things. Naming them is the hard part. Stopping them is what creates room for real growth.

Where is my business actually making money, and where am I pretending it does?

This one requires looking at revenue by segment, by service, by customer, with gross margin attached. Most founders have a story about their business that’s drifted from the numbers. The numbers don’t drift.

I’ve seen this pattern enough times that I look for it now. The founder thinks they run a 3-service-line firm. The numbers say they run a single-service-line firm with 2 expensive hobbies attached.

Who am I as a founder, and what do I want this business to give me?

This is the question most marketing work completely skips. Growth is one possible goal. Some founders want a business that supports a specific life. Some want an exit. And those are different businesses with entirely different marketing systems.

If you don’t know which one you’re building, no strategy can serve you. It’ll always optimize toward the wrong target.

What the Founder Portrait actually does

These 4 questions together produce what I call the Founder Portrait. It’s not a document you share or hand off. It’s the ground you stand on when you do the strategic work that comes next.

Without it, every downstream decision is made from an unstable position. The messaging, the ideal client definition, the channels, the campaigns: all of it inherits whatever you were confused about when you built it.

You can only build a system on what you actually know. The Founder Portrait is how you find out.

One thing to do this week

Sit down for one hour with a blank page and answer the 4 questions. No team. No advisors. No AI. Just you and the page.

Don’t try to turn the answers into a plan yet. The work this week is to see the business clearly. Everything else comes after that.

The Founder Portrait is the starting point. The rest of the system is what comes next. I’ve put the complete framework in a new ebook: “7 Steps to Small Business Marketing Success.” It covers everything from defining your ideal client to building a referral engine that actually runs. Grab it at dtm.world/7steps.

Why the Smartest Leader Usually Fails

Why the Smartest Leader Usually Fails written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the full episode:

Overview

Most companies hit a ceiling not because of strategy or market conditions, but because the leader is still trying to be the smartest person in the room. In this episode, John Jantsch sits down with Jason Wild, executive advisor and co-author of Genius at Scale, published by HBR Press, to make the case that the lone genius model of leadership is not just outdated. It is actively holding companies back.

Jason spent more than 20 years in senior roles at Microsoft, IBM, and Salesforce, leading projects across 40 countries. He watched brilliant people pour their careers into innovation efforts that succeeded at rates of five to fifteen percent, not because the ideas were bad, but because the conditions around those ideas were never built to support them. Genius at Scale is his answer to that problem.

This episode covers the shift from pathfinding to wayfinding, the three leadership roles that drive repeatable innovation, why most good ideas die in integration rather than ideation, and what small business owners can do right now to build a team that does not need them to be the source of every good idea.

About Jason Wild

Jason Wild is an executive advisor, co-founder of Wild Innovation Consulting, and co-author of Genius at Scale: How Great Leaders Drive Innovation, published by HBR Press. He spent more than two decades in senior leadership roles at IBM, Microsoft, and Salesforce and has led projects in 40 countries. Earlier in his career he had television and film credits, including a co-starring role opposite Mr. T in a CBS movie. Learn more at geniusatscale.com.

Key Takeaways

  • Stop hiring for the A player. Build the A team. The distinction sounds small but it changes everything about how you lead, hire, and structure work.
  • Innovation is a social process. You cannot mandate it. You have to create the conditions where people feel safe enough and inspired enough to want to co-create the future with you.
  • Most innovation stalls at integration, not ideation. Good ideas are not the bottleneck. Getting them through the seams between people, systems, and teams is where everything falls apart.
  • Language shapes culture more than most leaders realize. The Pfizer VP who banned the word change and replaced it with evolve saw an immediate shift in how his skeptical team responded to new initiatives.
  • The most dangerous place to make decisions is your office. Getting out and experiencing what your customers actually experience is not a nice-to-have. It is a leadership practice.
  • Celebrating individual achievement sends the wrong signal. If you want collaboration to be the norm, recognize teams, not heroes.
  • Wayfinding is replacing pathfinding. In a world changing this fast, the job of a leader is not to set a fixed destination and remove barriers. It is to figure out where you are going while you are already moving.
  • Self-awareness is an underrated leadership skill. How you make people feel when you give feedback shapes whether they will ever bring you their best thinking again.
  • Small business owners are better positioned for this than they think. Smaller teams, less bureaucracy, and closer proximity to customers are advantages in building cultures of repeatable innovation.

Timestamps

[00:02] Opening hook: the reason your company hits a ceiling might have nothing to do with strategy.

[00:53] Jason’s first career in Hollywood and co-starring with Mr. T in a CBS movie of the week.

[01:44] The core premise: why the lone genius model of leadership fails and what replaces it.

[03:33] What Jason saw at IBM that shaped his thinking about why smart people accept such low innovation success rates.

[06:37] Why small business founders are wired to be the genius in the room and why that eventually becomes the ceiling.

[07:19] The ABC framework: architect, bridger, and catalyst unpacked.

[10:07] Why the architect role is really about culture and psychological safety.

[11:03] The bridger as the unsung hero of innovation and why Death Valley is where most good ideas go to die.

[13:04] The role outside consultants and third parties play in bridging across boundaries.

[14:03] What catalysts do differently and how movements start with people and ideas, not companies.

[16:35] The Pfizer story: how banning the word change helped get a vaccine out in 266 days instead of eight to ten years.

[18:25] What we typically celebrate about leadership that the research says is actually wrong.

[20:31] How writing the book as a collaborative team proved its own thesis.

Memorable Quotes

“Stop trying to hire the A player. Focus on building the A team. It sounds subtle but it is a fundamentally different way to lead.”

“Innovation is not about coming up with the best idea. The organizations that innovate time and time again focus on the conditions and the environment around the idea.”

“Most innovation stalls not at the ideation phase but the integration phase. That is where good ideas go off to die.”

“Self-awareness is one of the most undervalued skills in leadership. How you make people feel when you give them feedback determines whether they will ever bring you their real thinking.”

“If the billionaire founder can make time to stand in line at a bank branch, everyone else can practice empathy too.”

Learn more at geniusatscale.com.



Download


New Tab

John Jantsch (00:02.083)

So what if the reason your company hits a ceiling has nothing to do with strategy, funding or market conditions and everything to do with who you think the genius in the room is supposed to be? Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch and my guest today is Jason Wilde. He’s an executive advisor and co-author of a book we’re going to talk about today, Genius at Scale, How Great Leaders Drive Innovation. was published by HBR Press.

Jason spent more than 20 years in senior roles at Microsoft, IBM, and Salesforce and led projects in 40 countries and co-founded Wild Innovation Consulting. And this wasn’t in your bio, I don’t think, but I found you had some television credits, movie credits. So can we start there?

Jason Wild (00:53.47)

We can start wherever you want, John. It’s great to on your show, yes. My first career was Hollywood. My mom was the classic stage actor, stage mom, trying to get me and my brother to be famous. So yes, believe it or not.

John Jantsch (01:09.562)

That’s awesome. So you started with Mr. T in something? Is that one I found maybe? Was he? Yeah.

Jason Wild (01:16.238)

I did. did. It’s, yeah, going back to the eighties, but at the peak of his his fame in the 18, I did co-starred a movie was the CBS movie of week called The Toughest Man in the World that you can find on Amazon or YouTube. I think actually a few years ago, I found a YouTube clip where whoever uploaded the clips said it was the worst fight scene in Hollywood history. And I agree.

John Jantsch (01:43.081)

Well, you have that permanent record for you. All right, so let’s dive into the book. The core idea is that the idea of the genius at the top, the boss, is really now out of date and what’s needed now is genius at scale. Can you make that concrete really for a business owner, say, running a team of 10, 20 people?

Jason Wild (02:08.046)

Yeah, absolutely. this is a book that when my co-author invited me to write the book almost 10 years ago, I kind of thought it would be the book writing version of the Gilligan’s Island, right? It’d be maybe a two, three year tour. And here we are, believe it or not, almost 10 years later and thousands and thousands of hours and worth every minute. So basic premise was I was not interested. I’m a practitioner. You know, I’ve been leading projects in teams.

trying to do meaningful work around technology, digital transformation, cultures of innovation around the world with large companies as well as startups. honestly, at this point in my career, John, I was not interested in just writing a book to write a book. But I was really lucky to start my career at IBM when Lou Gerstner was still CEO there and got to interact with Lou a little bit and

And it was a really important moment, I think, for me at that part of my career, because IBM was very client focused, very customer centric. And that was ingrained deeply in my brain. I was surrounded literally by geniuses. I was there when IBM did Watson on Jeopardy. I got to know the guy who invented the relational database, eventually a small company called Oracle monetized and created a nice little business around.

John Jantsch (03:30.042)

You

Jason Wild (03:33.711)

You know, as I was working on these projects, long story short, I was seeing these incredibly talented people literally pour their life into these projects or whatever it is they were working on, but accepting very low success rates, 5%, 10%, 15%. And, you know, I bought into the same notion that innovation was all about coming up with the best idea, that it was about the lone genius.

John Jantsch (03:58.329)

you

Jason Wild (04:01.672)

I’m the person with the biggest title and power. But over time, I became really curious about what really did set out in a small company or a big company. You why did some ideas, you know, go far enough along to actually change the way that we live or work or change the system? And others didn’t. And it kind of became a little bit of my career and life passion. And I saw so many of these people that I really looked up to just approaching it kind of the wrong way.

falling in love with the ideas, focusing on the world of innovation. And maybe they get lucky or there’s some heroic result, but the real organizations or teams that were great at innovating time and time again, were the ones that really focused more on the conditions and the environment around them. And so, we started talking about Mr. T, it took me 40 years for my life to come full circle away.

But, know, genius at scale in some ways is meant to kind of put down this notion of, you know, senior leaders stop looking to hire that A-Team player and instead focus on building an A-Team. And I think it sounds very small and subtle, but it’s a big part of the difference. And then when I looked at it, there are lots of books on innovation, of course, and lots of books on leadership, but there are no books about how do you actually lead innovation.

John Jantsch (05:25.433)

Yes.

Jason Wild (05:25.486)

which to me was really really fascinating because it’s one of those words or topics that lots of people lean forward, they’re interested, they’re curious, but there was a lot more opinions than actual science around how do you actually create those conditions as a leader for people to be willing and able to want to innovate. In my co-author’s last book that was published about 12 years ago, focused a lot on companies like Pixar and eBay.

right, super creative, know, digital native companies where innovating is not easy, but it’s certainly easier than being, you know, a mom and pop small company, right, or a legacy company that, you know, was founded 80 years ago. So in Geniuses Scale, the book that we wrote, we, you know, we focused on companies in regulated environments, healthcare, banking, you know, as well as startups, startups in Africa and Japan to really shine a light on, you know,

Everyone’s context is different, but really the role of leaders is to create the environment where innovation organically thrives as a result of the community versus constantly trying to chase the next shiny object.

John Jantsch (06:37.322)

So, a lot of my listeners are small business owners, mid-size business owners, founders. And I think the very nature of that is like, I created this thing, I’m the genius, it starts there. And so then I’m going to build a team and everybody looks to me to continue to say, what’s next? And you really introduce the evolution, I guess, that that leader needs to go through and even some roles that they need to take on. You’re ABC, you’ve got a good, like all consultants, you have a…

a good framework there for architect, bridger, and catalyst. Walk me through a little bit of what those roles are and maybe the challenges for lot of business owners to step into those roles.

Jason Wild (07:19.446)

Yeah, no, absolutely. I think, you know, for small businesses, you know, even large businesses these days, you know, doing business in the past was, don’t think it was ever easy, but it was, it was, it was easier. And, you know, and literally the world is shifting two or three feet underneath our feet, you know, every single week. So there’s so much to keep up with and

Yeah, you know, so legacy leadership was, you know, some would call kind of pathfinding to your point, whether you’re, you know, the owner of a small business or a 4,200, 500 company, right? And that legacy kind of leadership is change management, setting the direction, right? Articulating the vision, hopefully very, very clearly, and then convincing as many people as quickly as possible to get in the car and follow you to that, to that destination. And maybe that was okay, right? When you had the luxury of time.

But the world is changing really quickly and you could argue that it’s never going to be as slow as it is right now. It’s only going to accelerate. So part of what the book is about is this what we’re calling wayfinding. If classic leadership was pathfinding, setting that direction and trying to remove those inhibitors and barriers, which is even more important as a small business owner because your margin of error is even less than a large company.

It’s very uncomfortable for many leaders, regardless of your pedigree and your background. But I do think that small business owners are going to be more ready and in a better position to be able to pursue this. And what we talk about is more wayfinding. And part of the uncomfort is, how do you lead when we’re surrounded by fog? Because it’s not just artificial intelligence that’s changing the world. There’s geopolitical aspects, there’s supply chain.

There’s other technologies, quantum, 5G, blockchain, all of these things are like feeding off of each other that makes predicting the future even more difficult than it was before. So this notion of wayfinding is figuring out what the destination is while you’re on the path. And to your point, we identified common patterns and three very distinct roles that leaders play.

Jason Wild (09:39.119)

in cultures that have proven that they can innovate routinely in time and time again, and not just get lucky once or in the right place at the right time. So the ABCs, which yes, are convenient and memorable, but did kind of like surface naturally, you know, out of our research and work. So first and foremost, the foundation is the architect. And the architect’s job is really about building community. And what I touched on a little bit earlier,

John Jantsch (09:52.218)

you

Jason Wild (10:07.118)

it recognizes that innovation is a social process. And especially in small companies, you can’t mandate innovation. You have to invite people to want to co-create the future with you. And we define innovation very broadly, not just disruptive innovation, but anything that’s new and useful, which I think makes it even more applicable to the world of small business. So architects do a good job of creating environments where people are both willing and able.

to want to contribute, there’s a psychological safety. They don’t feel like there’s going to be a negative reaction when you challenge, right, or come up with a new idea. So that’s why that’s the foundation. And it is, it’s a lot about culture. It is totally about culture. And I think in a way where the culture is continuously learning and experimenting too. And I think especially for small business owners,

John Jantsch (10:47.064)

That sounds like culture to me.

Yeah.

Jason Wild (11:03.5)

Right, your business is not too big or too small to at least have a couple of working hypotheses. And I think that’s what great architects do is they have working hypotheses and they encourage and empower others to have working hypotheses of at least one or two big questions this calendar year that we want to get smarter about. And those questions will lead us to better questions. So architect is a foundation and I think we realize that

You know, that’s important, but it’s not enough. And then the next one is the Bridger B. Bridger is really about focusing on building partnerships and Bridgers, you know, tend to be more junior people in the organization. And I really feel having been a practitioner and out there like doing the work, the Bridger is the unsung hero of innovation where the architects maybe get, you know, the award and the Steven Spielberg and the Oscar.

And then we’ll get to the catalyst, which is about igniting movements that literally change the world. The bridgers are usually behind the scenes doing really tough work and recognize that, recognizing that most innovation stalls, not at the ideation phase of coming up with the ideas, but the integration phase, human integration, system integration, integration with partners. So these bridges are, you know, focus on these boundaries or these seams.

where lots of good ideas go off to die. And one of my previous employers actually called this area Death Valley, as if it was a place that was a badge of honor if you survived it. So great architects and bridgers kind of flip the lens and create environments where it’s not about surviving Death Valley, but it’s about creating conditions.

John Jantsch (12:32.09)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (12:46.03)

Well, so what role then does like outside consultants and third parties play in that too? I’ve said, when you talk about partnerships, you’re kind of focusing on internally, but bringing in great talent from the outside is probably a part of that bridge, isn’t it?

Jason Wild (13:04.994)

Yeah, it is. It can be internal and external. can be sales and marketing, business and tech, right? A lot of it is people who speak different languages, have different objectives, feel that they’re part of a different community. And, but you got to get them to kind of work together. They may not want to like hang out together at the end of the day and be best friends, but you know, the role of that leader and that bridger is getting the collective value out of them that individually never would have happened. So.

Absolutely, there’s a lot of focus on partnering externally. And I think what Bridges, Bridges are good at many things, but one of things that really good at John is building trust in low trust environments, being proactive at mapping the ecosystem and places where, hey, if this goes well or not well, we think we’re going to need some solutions or partners here and not waiting until it’s a five alarm fire. And they give credit to others and go out of their way.

John Jantsch (13:45.338)

Mm-hmm.

Jason Wild (14:03.192)

to make others the hero and not about themselves. And then C is the catalyst, C is about really igniting movements, movements that become bigger than the individuals. And I think this is where it’s not every day where people wake up and say, hey, John, I want to ignite a global movement, right? Because it just seems so far away.

And, but you look, I I worked at Salesforce for many years, which is one of the CRM platforms for small business. And, you know, what’s interesting about a place like Salesforce is it’s become kind of the de facto movement for CRM and cloud computing. So a lot of people associate the companies with those movements, but movements are really started by people and ideas. And so part of the reason of the book is to give hope.

to people that it may seem very difficult or impossible, but anybody can ignite a movement that changes how we work and live with the right focus and other best practices that obviously we would love for you and people to read the book and learn about.

John Jantsch (15:13.478)

Well, so the ABCs basically add up to what you’re saying is we need to have collective genius in order to have innovation. how do, I mean, do people resist or maybe misunderstand that idea?

Jason Wild (15:29.656)

Yeah, think there’s resistance everywhere. one of the things that I think in writing the book, we wanted to write a book that is educational and inspiring, but also a business book that doesn’t put you to sleep and has an element of entertainment because we’re so fortunate and privileged, John, to be able to have studied for years some of these leaders and be a fly on the wall.

And one of them was the leader of clinical supply chain at Pfizer, who was a relatively new executive. And it’s the story behind what he and his team did to get the vaccine out there in 266 days, in usually what would take eight to 10 years. And one of the things that they did was a real focus on language. And it’s a reminder that every detail matters if you want it to.

And Michael Koo, this Pfizer VP, he inherited the team that was skeptical of almost everything, just because of past failures and attempts and other leaders and the usual stuff inside of a big company. And one of the things that Michael decided in his first few months of joining Pfizer was he banned the word change. And it sounds very petty, but…

John Jantsch (16:52.346)

Hmm.

Jason Wild (16:56.386)

I think it represents a bit of the genius of him understanding the environment that he was parachuting into. And instead he said, let’s talk about evolve. Cause when people would talk about change, immediately it would be a negative reaction, more change. We went through a change management program last year. I’m tired of change, but who doesn’t want to evolve, right? Who doesn’t want to keep up with the Joneses? And so there was something psychological there about

You know, everyone should want to get better, better, better at their craft. And if you don’t, why are you here? And I think you again have less luxury in a small business. So language matters. And I think self-awareness is one of the most undervalued skills of leadership. How you make people feel when you give them feedback.

And these soft skills now with the arrival of AI, you you hear lots of people saying they’re not soft skills anymore, right? Because, you know, getting the most out of people and tapping into as Pixar would say, everyone has their slice of genius is not the responsibility of the individual worker. It’s of the leader to activate that and figure out what it is individually.

John Jantsch (17:58.614)

You

John Jantsch (18:11.918)

Yeah, I’m curious because you studied so many exceptional leaders, are there things that we typically celebrate that are wrong about leadership and leadership culture that your research found?

Jason Wild (18:25.294)

Oh yeah, know lots of things. One of the things that’s a pet peeve of mine is celebrating like individual awards. And I mean, even like Thomas Edison said, it’s like, nobody did anything alone. And whether it’s intentional or not, just putting someone up on stage as an individual, it sends their own signals of, right, be an individual hero and be like this person, right? And you’ll get to lift the trophy too.

and instead recognize teams. And that might mean that sometimes you’re recognizing people who, you know, aren’t pulling their own weight. But the real message you’re trying to send to the organization is collaboration is not optional. And even better, get great at collaboration because that’s how like meaningful value creation happens. I think the second thing is, that back to stop trying to be the smartest person in the room. And instead,

try to activate that collective intelligence of the entire team. And I think the third one, and I’m not as worried about this small business, but I’ll say it anyway, is what do you think is the most dangerous place to make a decision,

John Jantsch (19:39.81)

in a meeting.

Jason Wild (19:41.635)

Yeah, in the office, right? In the comfort of your office. So I’m a big believer in getting out there and walking a mile in the shoes of your customers. Do it sometimes with purpose. Do it sometimes with a blank sheet of paper. I worked at Salesforce. Mark Benioff, the founder, co-founder of Salesforce, is a billionaire. know, famously ahead of a big meeting with one of the big American banks.

John Jantsch (19:52.792)

This is

Jason Wild (20:08.77)

He wanted to go to a local branch, wait in line, to see the experience. And Yad helped him prepare for the meeting, but it was more about sending a signal to the whole organization that if the billionaire founder can care about time to do it, then everyone else can practice and develop empathy. So those are a few things off the top of my head.

John Jantsch (20:31.406)

So this book, you had a co-writer, so this book in some ways was collective genius. Do you think that that collaboration itself made for a better book or at least a different experience than writing a solo book?

Jason Wild (20:45.442)

I think so, for sure. And we’re still friends, thankfully. so yeah, it’s a multi-generational team. I’m in the middle. know, two academics with me as a practitioner. And yeah, I think it was just a phenomenal experience that I think we all agree that there’s no way we would have ended up where we got to if we tried to do this alone.

And I think the most important thing is that, you you write a book, but you never know how the world is going to respond. And, you know, I think some of the things like wayfinding is in the epilogue. And we wanted to write a book that was meant to be timeless, because I have some friends writing books about AI. You know, one was the former chief AI officer at NASA. And like tongue in cheek, I tell them like, good luck, hopefully it’s still relevant by the time it’s published. And

John Jantsch (21:40.806)

Yeah, no kidding.

Jason Wild (21:42.286)

So it’s interesting that we didn’t write a book about AI, but a lot of people serendipitously are saying that the ABCs represent a really interesting operating system, right? Because organizations, you need some structure and predictability, but again, you need to adapt and flex and morph your value proposition like great startups do. And so I don’t think we would have landed there without this,

two exceptional co-authors that I’ve had the privilege of working

John Jantsch (22:15.578)

Well, and I think you also surfaced in this day and age, what are probably going to be the human skills that are going to remain the most valuable, I think, in the long run as well. Well, Jason, I appreciate you taking a few moments to stop by the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. Is there a place you’d invite people to connect with you and certainly learn more about Genius at Scale?

Jason Wild (22:35.756)

Yes, thanks for asking. yeah, it was just published a couple of months ago. We’ve got a wonderful website in multiple languages, genius at scale.com, genius at scale all one.

John Jantsch (22:49.144)

Awesome. Well, again, I appreciate you stopping by and hopefully we’ll run into you one of these days out there on the road.

Jason Wild (22:53.977)

Sounds great. Thank you so much, John.


Scroll back to top